Skip to main content
InfraGap.com Logo
Home
Getting Started
Core Concept What is a CDE? How It Works Benefits CDE Assessment Getting Started Guide CDEs for Startups
AI & Automation
AI Coding Assistants Agentic AI AI-Native IDEs Agentic Engineering AI Agent Orchestration AI Governance AI-Assisted Architecture Shift-Left AI LLMOps Autonomous Development AI/ML Workloads GPU Computing
Implementation
Architecture Patterns DevContainers Advanced DevContainers Language Quickstarts IDE Integration CI/CD Integration Platform Engineering Developer Portals Container Registry Multi-CDE Strategies Remote Dev Protocols Nix Environments
Operations
Performance Optimization High Availability & DR Disaster Recovery Monitoring Capacity Planning Multi-Cluster Development Troubleshooting Runbooks Ephemeral Environments
Security
Security Deep Dive Zero Trust Architecture Secrets Management Vulnerability Management Network Security IAM Guide Supply Chain Security Air-Gapped Environments AI Agent Security MicroVM Isolation Compliance Guide Governance
Planning
Pilot Program Design Stakeholder Communication Risk Management Migration Guide Cost Analysis FinOps GreenOps Vendor Evaluation Training Resources Developer Onboarding Team Structure DevEx Metrics Industry Guides
Resources
Tools Comparison CDE vs Alternatives Case Studies Lessons Learned Glossary FAQ

Sandbox Environments

Request-level isolation patterns that test changes in production-like conditions without full environment duplication, reducing costs by 85-90% compared to traditional approaches

85-90%
Cost reduction
Per-Request
Traffic isolation
MicroVM
Hardware-level isolation
AI-Ready
Agent sandboxing

What Are Sandbox Environments?

A fundamentally different approach to testing changes that uses request-level routing instead of full environment duplication - now extended to isolate AI agent workloads with hardware-enforced boundaries.

The Core Concept

Sandbox environments are isolated testing contexts that intercept and route specific requests to modified versions of individual services while leaving the rest of the application stack untouched. Rather than spinning up a complete copy of your entire infrastructure, sandboxes deploy only the services you have changed and use intelligent traffic routing to direct relevant requests to those modified instances.

This approach is sometimes called "request-level isolation" or "traffic sandboxing." The key insight is that most changes affect only one or two services in a microservices architecture, so duplicating the entire environment is wasteful. Sandboxes leverage the existing shared infrastructure for all unchanged services and only spin up isolated instances for the specific components under test.

The result is a testing experience that feels like a full production-like environment from the perspective of the request being tested, but consumes a fraction of the infrastructure resources. Teams can run dozens or even hundreds of concurrent sandboxes on the same base infrastructure without significant cost increases.

How Request Routing Works

Sandbox environments rely on a routing layer - typically a service mesh or smart proxy - that inspects incoming requests for routing metadata. This metadata, often passed as HTTP headers or baggage context, tells the router which sandbox a request belongs to. When a request arrives with a sandbox identifier, the router checks whether the target service has an isolated sandbox instance. If it does, the request is forwarded to the sandbox version. If not, the request flows to the shared baseline service as normal.

Header-based routing

Requests carry a sandbox ID in HTTP headers that propagates through the entire call chain

Context propagation

OpenTelemetry baggage or custom middleware ensures routing context survives across service-to-service calls

Selective interception

Only services with sandbox overrides receive routed traffic - everything else uses the shared baseline

Fallback to baseline

Unmatched requests pass through to shared services, maintaining full application functionality

Sandbox Request Flow

Traffic routing through a sandbox environment in a microservices architecture

Incoming Request

Request arrives with sandbox header (e.g., x-sandbox-id: feature-123)

Smart Router

Service mesh inspects header and checks for sandbox overrides

Route Decision

Changed service gets sandbox instance; unchanged services use baseline

Response

Full end-to-end response combines sandbox and baseline services

AI Agent Sandboxing

As AI coding agents generate and execute code autonomously, sandboxing has evolved from a developer convenience to a security requirement. Modern agent sandboxes use microVMs for hardware-enforced isolation.

Why AI Agents Need Sandboxes

AI coding agents like Claude Code, Codex CLI, Gemini CLI, and Kiro generate and execute code with increasing autonomy. Unlike a human developer who can visually inspect commands before running them, agents operate at machine speed and may execute destructive operations, install untrusted packages, or make unexpected network calls. Sandboxing provides the safety boundary that lets organizations run agents unsupervised without risking host systems or production infrastructure.

The 2026 consensus is clear: shared-kernel container isolation is no longer sufficient for executing untrusted AI-generated code. Containers share the host kernel, meaning a kernel exploit in agent-generated code could escape the container boundary. MicroVM-based sandboxing provides hardware-enforced isolation with dedicated kernels per workload, eliminating this attack vector while maintaining near-container performance.

Agent sandboxes also need capabilities beyond simple isolation: filesystem snapshots for branching execution paths, network allow/deny lists to control agent access, session time limits to prevent runaway processes, and observability into what the agent is doing inside the sandbox.

MicroVM-Based Isolation

MicroVMs are lightweight virtual machines optimized for fast startup and minimal resource overhead. Technologies like Firecracker (which powers AWS Lambda and Fargate) boot in under 200ms with only 3-5MB of memory overhead per instance - a fraction of traditional VMs. Each microVM gets its own kernel, providing hardware-enforced isolation without the performance penalty of full virtualization.

Firecracker microVMs

Sub-200ms boot times with dedicated kernels, used by E2B and Docker Sandboxes for agent isolation

Kata Containers

OCI-compatible microVMs that integrate with Kubernetes, used by Northflank for agent sandboxing

gVisor (user-space kernel)

Intercepts syscalls without full VMs - lighter weight but weaker isolation than hardware-enforced boundaries

Snapshot and fork

Agents can snapshot mid-execution and fork into parallel branches, enabling speculative exploration of multiple solution paths

MICROVM

E2B

Purpose-built sandbox platform for AI agents using Firecracker microVMs. Offers 150ms startup times, Python and JavaScript SDKs, and OCI image support. Each sandbox gets a dedicated kernel for hardware-enforced isolation of AI-generated code execution.

Firecracker SDK-First 150ms Boot
AGENT-NATIVE

Daytona

Pivoted from CDEs to agent-native compute infrastructure in 2025. Provides millisecond sandbox launches with snapshotting and parallel branch forking. Raised $24M Series A in early 2026. Used by LangChain, Turing, Writer, and SambaNova for AI agent workloads.

Snapshots Branch Forking SDK
MICROVM

Docker Sandboxes

Isolates coding agents like Claude Code, Codex, and Gemini CLI inside dedicated microVMs with their own Docker daemon. Each agent gets a version of your development environment with only project workspace mounted. Includes network allow/deny lists for controlling agent access.

Docker Desktop Network Isolation Multi-Agent

Sandboxes vs Ephemeral Environments

Both approaches solve the "test in isolation" problem, but they take fundamentally different paths to get there. Understanding the trade-offs helps you choose the right tool.

Sandbox Environments

REQUEST-LEVEL ISOLATION
  • Intercepts specific requests via header-based routing
  • Only deploys changed services - shares everything else
  • 85-90% cheaper than full duplication
  • Tests against real production-like traffic patterns
  • Scales to hundreds of concurrent sandboxes

Best for: Microservices architectures, high team concurrency, cost-sensitive organizations, production-like validation, AI agent workloads

Ephemeral Environments

FULL DUPLICATION
  • Creates a complete copy of the entire application stack
  • Fully isolated - no shared state or infrastructure
  • Simpler mental model - "my own copy of everything"
  • No routing complexity or header propagation required
  • Works with any architecture (monolith or microservices)

Best for: Monolithic applications, full-stack E2E testing, compliance requirements needing complete isolation, smaller teams

DimensionSandboxEphemeral
Isolation levelPer-request / per-serviceFull environment
Resource costLow (only changed services)High (full stack per env)
Spin-up timeMilliseconds to seconds (microVM / single service)Seconds to minutes (full stack)
Concurrency100s on same base infra10s before cost becomes prohibitive
ComplexityRequires service mesh / routing layerSimpler - standard IaC provisioning
Architecture fitMicroservices on KubernetesAny architecture
Data isolationShared databases with tenant routingDedicated databases per environment
AI agent supportMicroVM isolation, snapshot/fork, network controlsFull environment per agent session

When to Use Each Approach

Choose Sandboxes When:

  • You run microservices on Kubernetes
  • Many developers need concurrent isolated testing
  • Cost efficiency is a top priority
  • You want production-like traffic conditions
  • Changes typically affect 1-3 services at a time
  • AI agents need isolated execution environments

Choose Ephemeral Environments When:

  • You run a monolithic or tightly coupled application
  • Full data isolation is required for compliance
  • You need stakeholder-facing preview URLs
  • Changes span many services simultaneously
  • Routing complexity is not acceptable for your team

Tools and Platforms

The sandbox ecosystem includes purpose-built platforms for request-level isolation, CDE tools with sandbox capabilities, and a growing category of AI agent sandbox infrastructure.

K8S-NATIVE

Signadot

Kubernetes-native sandbox platform purpose-built for request-level isolation in microservices architectures. Deploys lightweight sandboxes containing only changed services while sharing the existing cluster for everything else. Now includes AI development support with MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration, letting AI coding assistants like Claude Code interact directly with sandbox resources for autonomous testing workflows.

Automatic context propagation through service mesh
CI/CD integration for PR-triggered sandboxes
MCP server for AI agent sandbox orchestration
Web UI and CLI workspace creation
Kubernetes Service Mesh MCP AI Dev
LOCAL-TO-CLUSTER

Blackbird (formerly Telepresence)

Ambassador Labs integrated Telepresence into Blackbird in early 2025, consolidating their API development tooling into a single platform. Blackbird provides a two-way network tunnel between your local machine and a remote Kubernetes cluster, intercepting traffic destined for a specific service and redirecting it locally. Developers get sandbox-like isolation with hot-reload and full debugger access against live cluster traffic without deploying to the cluster during active development.

Intercept cluster traffic to your local machine
Personal intercepts with header-based routing
Unified API development and testing workflow
Gravitee Local Dev Traffic Intercept
CDE PLATFORM

Coder

Coder's Terraform-based workspace templates provision sandbox-style environments connected to shared cluster infrastructure. In 2025, Coder introduced AI Workspaces with Agent Boundaries (a dual-firewall model for scoping agent access) and Coder Tasks for running AI agents with full context and isolation. Supports modules for Codex, Gemini, Cursor, Kiro, and other AI tools, with scoped API keys for secure automation.

AI Workspaces with Agent Boundaries and Coder Tasks
Terraform templates for sandbox provisioning
Prebuilt Workspaces for instant branch-based development
Self-hosted on your own infrastructure (AWS, Azure, GCP, on-prem)
Terraform AI Workspaces Self-Hosted
AI AGENT PLATFORM

Ona (formerly Gitpod)

Ona rebranded from Gitpod in September 2025, pivoting from a pure CDE platform to an AI agent development platform. Ona Environments remain the secure, ephemeral CDEs that Gitpod pioneered, now integrated with Ona Agents - AI assistants that generate code, run commands, create pull requests, and respond to review feedback. Workspace configurations can connect to shared sandbox infrastructure for resource-efficient testing with the fast startup times Ona is known for.

Ona Agents for autonomous code generation and review
Prebuild snapshots for instant sandbox startup
Git-native workflow with branch-based sandboxes
AI Agents Prebuilds Git-Native

CDE Integration

How cloud development environments and sandbox environments work together to create a seamless development and testing workflow - now with AI agent orchestration built in.

CDE Workspaces Meet Sandbox Infrastructure

The most powerful development workflow combines CDE workspaces for coding with sandbox environments for testing. In this model, developers write and build code inside a CDE workspace - a remote, cloud-based development environment with full IDE support. When they are ready to test, the CDE workspace provisions a sandbox that deploys only their changed services into the shared testing cluster.

This integration eliminates the traditional gap between development and testing. Developers do not need to push code to a CI pipeline and wait for a full environment build. Instead, their CDE workspace directly connects to the sandbox infrastructure, enabling instant testing of in-progress changes against the full service mesh.

CDE platforms like Coder and Ona can be configured with workspace templates that automatically set up sandbox connections, inject routing headers into local development servers, and tear down sandbox resources when the workspace is stopped. With Coder's AI Workspaces and Ona Agents, AI coding assistants can now autonomously provision sandboxes, run tests, and validate changes without human intervention.

Template-Driven Sandbox Provisioning

Platform engineering teams can create standardized sandbox templates that abstract away the complexity of request routing and service mesh configuration. These templates define which services are sandboxable, how routing rules are applied, and what shared infrastructure is available as a baseline.

Terraform sandbox modules

Reusable Terraform modules that provision sandbox instances with proper routing rules and network policies

Self-service sandbox creation

Developers and AI agents request sandboxes through CDE workspace UI, CLI, or MCP protocol without platform team involvement

Automatic lifecycle management

Sandboxes are tied to workspace lifecycle - when the CDE workspace stops, sandbox resources are automatically cleaned up

Guardrails and quotas

Templates enforce resource limits, TTL policies, agent boundaries, and per-team sandbox quotas to prevent sprawl

CDE + Sandbox Architecture

How CDE workspaces connect to sandbox infrastructure for seamless development, testing, and AI agent orchestration

CDE Workspace

Developer or AI agent operates in a remote workspace with full IDE, build tools, and Git integration

Agent Layer

AI agents provision sandboxes via MCP or SDK, run tests, and validate changes autonomously

Sandbox Layer

Changed services deployed in microVM-isolated sandboxes with routing rules for targeted traffic

Shared Cluster

Baseline services, databases, and infrastructure shared across all sandboxes and workspaces

Cost-Benefit Analysis

The economics of sandbox environments versus full environment duplication, with real-world cost projections.

Why Sandboxes Cost Less

The cost savings from sandbox environments come from a simple principle: most of the infrastructure in a typical development or staging environment is unchanged between tests. When you duplicate an entire environment for each developer or PR, you are paying for dozens of identical copies of services that nobody modified. Sandboxes eliminate this waste by sharing the unchanged baseline.

In a typical microservices application with 20-50 services, a developer's change usually touches 1-3 services. With full duplication, you are paying for 20-50 service instances per environment. With sandboxes, you pay for 1-3 instances plus the shared baseline that serves all developers. The math is straightforward: if you have 20 developers each needing isolated testing, full duplication requires 20x your full stack, while sandboxes require 1x your full stack plus roughly 20 x 2 additional service instances.

Beyond compute savings, sandboxes also reduce storage costs (no per-environment databases), networking costs (shared ingress and service mesh), and operational overhead (one baseline to maintain instead of dozens of full environments). For organizations running AI agents that spin up environments at machine speed, the cost multiplier of full duplication becomes even more prohibitive.

ROI and Payback Period

Organizations adopting sandbox environments typically see ROI within 2-4 months, significantly faster than the 6-12 month payback period for full CDE adoption. The initial investment is smaller because sandbox tooling layers on top of your existing Kubernetes infrastructure rather than requiring a new platform. The ongoing savings are immediate and compound as team size grows.

Beyond direct infrastructure savings, sandbox environments deliver productivity ROI through faster feedback loops. Developers who previously waited 10-15 minutes for a full environment to provision can have a sandbox running in seconds. Over a team of 20 developers running 5-10 test cycles per day, this time savings alone justifies the tooling investment. AI agents amplify this further - an agent running 50-100 test cycles per day in millisecond-launch sandboxes can validate changes at a pace impossible with traditional environments.

The ROI improves further when you factor in the reduction in shared staging environment conflicts. Teams that previously queued for access to a single staging environment can now run unlimited concurrent sandboxes, eliminating the bottleneck that causes context-switching and delayed releases.

Example: 20-Developer Team, 40-Service Application

Monthly infrastructure cost comparison for concurrent isolated testing

Full Duplication

$48,000

20 full environments x 40 services each x $60/service/month

800 total service instances running

Sandbox Approach

$4,800

1 shared baseline (40 services) + 20 devs x 2 sandboxed services x $60

80 total service instances running

Monthly Savings

$43,200

90% reduction in infrastructure spend

$518,400 annual savings

Database Cost Savings

Shared databases with tenant-level isolation eliminate the need for per-environment database instances, reducing storage and licensing costs by 80-95%.

Developer Time Savings

Sandbox spin-up in seconds versus minutes for full environments. Over 20 developers averaging 8 test cycles daily, this saves 40-80 hours of wait time per month.

Operational Overhead

One shared baseline to maintain instead of dozens of full environments. Platform teams spend less time on environment provisioning and more time on developer experience improvements.